Selon la rumeur, Buzz sur thinking fast and slow arabic
Selon la rumeur, Buzz sur thinking fast and slow arabic
Blog Article
When I started reading, I spent most of my time using my System 2 to think and understand. (It takes time and brain energy to read and understand)
I think this book is mistitled. Connaissance years, I assumed that it was some kind of self-help book embout when to trust your gut and when to trust your head, and thus I put hors champ reading it. Plaisant Thinking, Fast and Slow is nothing of the destin.
System 1 generates answers to demande without any experience of conscious deliberation. Most often these answers are reasonable, such as when answering the Demande “What you like a cheeseburger?” (Answer: yes). Fin, as Kahneman demonstrates, there are many disposition in which the answer that springs suddenly to mind is demonstrably false.
I used to think that politicians answered a different Interrogation to the one given by the enquérir in année attempt to Supposé que evasive. Post Kahneman I wonder if this is just the natural tendency of the brain to substitute an easier Interrogation conscience a harder Je. Who knows.
As a result of this, our evaluations of life plaisir can often have very little to do with our real, experiential well being. This presents usages with something of a paradox, since we often ut things, not for how much joy they will bring us in the imminent, but connaissance the nice Souvenir they will create. Think about this: How much money would you spend je a vacation if you knew that every impression of the experience would Lorsque wiped désuet as soon as the vacation ended, including positif and even your memories?
If the correlation between the discernement of spouses is less than perfect (and if men and women je average ut not differ in intelligence), then it is a mathematical inevitability that highly intelligent women will be married to husbands who are je average less pénétrant than they are (and vice versa, of excursion).
And the best ration of it is that this is the guy (pépite, at least one half of thinking fast and slow in french the two guys) who came up with these ideas in the first placette.
Our enthousiaste reactions are remarkably similar, apparently, and I found that I normally reacted to his devinette in the way that he predicted. If you are apt to believe that you are a rational person (as I am) it can be quite depressing.
How courtrooms are inhospitable to female trial lawyers, the nasty scientific feud over what killed the dinosaurs, and how your brain deceives you.
Representativeness would tell you to bet je the PhD, joli this is not necessarily wise. You should seriously consider the second dilemme, because many more nongraduates than PhDs raie in New York subways.
As I say, this sheep/goat take nous Thinking Fast is my own. Kahneman never goes there. Where he DOES go is to the value of experience in thinking fast:
Will I Lorsque able to dislodge my powerful Cran bias and allow the possibility that the person deserves some credit?
Thinking, Fast and Slow is Nous-mêmes of the most in-depth Psychology books I've read. I fell in love with the subject after taking AP Psychology last year as a junior in high school, and am currently craving more books and Rubrique related to the field.
A wrong answer, reached thanks to fondement-lérot neglect (a form of the representativeness heuristic) is “None. Mary is a couch potato.” The right answer—based nous-mêmes the data the extraordinaire ah helpfully provided—is Rocky’s Gym. When the affidé in the study were tested immediately after playing the game or watching the video and then a paire of months later, everybody improved, plaisant the game players improved more than the video watchers.